Profile Photo of Dr. Lauren Rodgers, MD

Dr. Lauren Rodgers, MD Complete Survey for This Doctor: Dr. Lauren Rodgers, MD, Patient Survey, Oxon Hill, MD, Obstetrics & Gynecology

Specializes in Obstetrics & Gynecology • Female • Age 52

6196 Oxon Hill Rd Ste 630
Oxon Hill, MD 20745
OverviewExperienceHospital QualityPatient SatisfactionAppointments & Offices

How was your experience with Dr. Rodgers?

Help other patients, and let the doctor know how she's doing

Dr. Rodgers' Office & Staff
Ease of scheduling urgent appointments
Office environment, cleanliness, comfort, etc.
Staff friendliness and courteousness
Experience with Dr. Rodgers
Level of trust in provider's decisions
How well provider explains medical condition(s)
How well provider listens and answers questions
Spends appropriate amount of time with patients
Likelihood of recommending Dr. Rodgers to family and friends*
Tell Us About Yourself
Your gender
Confirm survey via email or text message*
We will be sending you a link to verify your survey.

* Required

By submitting your survey, you agree to the terms and conditions of Healthgrades User Agreement, Editorial Policy, and Privacy Policy, and acknowledge you or a family member has been a patient of the provider.

Submit Survey

Find the Right Doctor For You.

  • Obstetrics & Gynecology
Dr. Kenneth A. De Sandies, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
0.04 miles away
Dr. Francis Dickson, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
6.99 miles away
Dr. Javaka K. Moore, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
5.21 miles away
Dr. Stephen Proctor Sr., MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
0.04 miles away
Dr. Susanne L. Prather, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
9.72 miles away
Dr. Said M. Ali, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
6.89 miles away
Dr. Kenneth Blank, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
7.67 miles away
Dr. Nahid Mazarei, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
6.89 miles away
Dr. Christopher A. Warner, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
2.12 miles away
Dr. Laura Stone, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
8.32 miles away
Dr. Mutahar Fauzia, MD
Obstetrics & Gynecology
8.36 miles away
The VideoCalloutContainer had no content.